Identity and trust: KYB, KYC and ongoing monitoring
02
How it works
5 min read · Chapter 2 of 10
How a business gets approved, step by step
Follow the landscaping company from application to monitoring. Most applications that stall go to manual review for documents. Approval is a snapshot: the checks continue for as long as the account is live.
- Applied: legal name and trade names (a DBA, "doing business as"), entity type, state and date of formation, registration number, EIN (the US federal tax ID), addresses, website, what it sells, expected volume, the payout bank account, and the people: owners of 25% or more plus one person who controls the company, each with name, date of birth, address and ID number. What can go wrong: the applicant types the trade name where the legal name should go.
- Business verified: find the right entity in the Delaware registry, and in Texas, where it's registered to operate. Check it's active and in good standing, look at recent changes, match the EIN to the legal name, classify the address and website, assign an industry code, check the prohibited lists, and build the ownership tree. What can go wrong: a name mismatch, an EIN that belongs to a parent company, a two-week-old LLC the vendor's copy of the registry hasn't caught yet, a foreign parent. These go to manual review, which usually means asking for documents: the articles of organization, the IRS letter confirming the EIN, an operating agreement, a bank statement.
- People verified: each owner and the control person, by data checks first and a document plus selfie when the data isn't enough; sanctions and PEP screening (politically exposed persons) on the company and every person. What can go wrong: a thin credit file, an owner abroad with no Social Security number, an owner who won't take a selfie.
- Approved, with limits: a risk rating and usually some limits: a volume cap, a rolling reserve (a share of each payout held back for a while), a delay on early payouts. What can go wrong: nobody revisits the limits.
- Monitored, for as long as it's live: re-screening on every list update, transaction monitoring against what the business said it would do, a review when owners, bank accounts or volumes change, and a refresh on a schedule set by risk. What can go wrong: the expected activity captured at onboarding was wrong, so every alert is noise.
Two exits sit off that path. Manual review sends a case back to the main path once the documents arrive, or to a decline. Offboarding comes from monitoring: restrict the account, close it, return the money, file a suspicious activity report if there's reason to suspect something, and keep the records for five years.
Vendors say older KYB setups send 30-70% of applications to a human, and every document round trip loses applicants, so most stuck applications are sitting in manual review waiting on a document. The cost after approval is bigger still: for a typical platform on a sponsor bank, ongoing monitoring and review are most of what the program costs in a year (see How companies of different sizes use it). A high-volume payment facilitator can spend more on review at onboarding instead.
The checks compared
US state registry lookup
- What it proves
- The company exists, and its status
- Rough cost (Oct 2026)
- Cents to a few dollars; Delaware charges $10-20 a status check
- Good customers it fails
- Sole proprietors (often not registered), brand-new companies
- How fraud beats it
- A hijacked or freshly formed company matches perfectly
EIN and name match (IRS)
- What it proves
- The tax ID belongs to that legal name
- Rough cost (Oct 2026)
- Often bundled; only companies that file 1099s can ask the IRS directly
- Good customers it fails
- Trade names, recent name changes
- How fraud beats it
- A real EIN paired with its real name
Ownership check
- What it proves
- Who owns 25% or more, and who controls
- Rough cost (Oct 2026)
- Mostly analyst time
- Good customers it fails
- Holding companies, funds, foreign parents
- How fraud beats it
- Nominees, or stakes kept just under the threshold
Bureau or database match
- What it proves
- Name, date of birth, SSN and address appear together in records
- Rough cost (Oct 2026)
- Roughly $0.20-1 (estimate)
- Good customers it fails
- Thin files, newcomers, people who moved or changed name
- How fraud beats it
- Synthetic identities built to match
SSA's eCBSV
- What it proves
- SSN, name and date of birth match Social Security's records
- Rough cost (Oct 2026)
- About $0.50, prepaid in annual tiers
- Good customers it fails
- Typos and name changes (most mismatches)
- How fraud beats it
- A stolen real identity passes
Phone, email and device signals
- What it proves
- Phone tenure, email age, device reputation, human or bot
- Rough cost (Oct 2026)
- Cents
- Good customers it fails
- Prepaid phones, new devices, privacy browsers
- How fraud beats it
- SIM swaps, device farms, aged emails bought in bulk
Document plus selfie and liveness
- What it proves
- The person matches a genuine-looking ID and is really there
- Rough cost (Oct 2026)
- About $1-2 at list price
- Good customers it fails
- Poor cameras, worn cards, some faces more than others
- How fraud beats it
- Deepfakes fed through a virtual camera; AI-made documents
Passport chip read
- What it proves
- Data signed by the issuing government
- Rough cost (Oct 2026)
- More (needs a mobile SDK)
- Good customers it fails
- No NFC phone, or no chip in the document
- How fraud beats it
- Very hard to forge; taking over the account later
Mobile driver's licence or other signed credential
- What it proves
- Data signed by the issuer and bound to a device
- Rough cost (Oct 2026)
- Low per check
- Good customers it fails
- Most people can't present one online yet
- How fraud beats it
- Taking over the phone or wallet
Bank login (Interac in Canada)
- What it proves
- A bank already verified this person
- Rough cost (Oct 2026)
- A fee per check
- Good customers it fails
- No eligible bank account
- How fraud beats it
- Taking over the bank login
List prices come from vendors' public pages; enterprise deals run lower, and the database and signal prices are my estimates, since bureaus don't publish theirs.
Then the question every business applicant raises: who counts as an owner, and where can you check it?
Owner threshold
- US
- 25% or more, plus one control person
- Canada
- 25% or more of shares or votes, or control
- UK
- More than 25%, or significant control
- EU
- 25% or more from July 10, 2027; can drop to 15% for higher-risk types
Public register
- US
- None for US companies; FinCEN's database now covers only about 28,000 foreign companies
- Canada
- Federal companies only, public since January 2024; Quebec has its own
- UK
- Yes, the PSC register (people with significant control)
- EU
- National registers, closed to the general public since a 2022 court ruling
Who verifies
- US
- The bank, which pushes it down to you
- Canada
- You confirm by a different method; report mismatches on high-risk federal companies within 30 days
- UK
- Companies House verifies directors' and owners' identity since November 2025
- EU
- You; registers gain powers to check
Next change
- US
- FinCEN rewrite of the ownership rule, under White House review since September 17, 2026
- Canada
- British Columbia's register (launch unconfirmed)
- UK
- Identity checks mandatory for everyone after November 17, 2026
- EU
- AMLR applies July 10, 2027; EU Company Certificate from July 2028
More on how the four fit together in Regulatory layering.