B2B payments: stablecoins and blockchain payments
08
Deep dive: stablecoins vs bank rails
7 min read · Chapter 8 of 10
Stablecoins vs bank rails: what's real
My view as of October 2026: for a business payment, stablecoins beat a bank wire across borders, roughly tie a good non-bank FX provider, and lose to ACH and real-time payments at home. Where they clearly win is time and reach: weekends, corridors banks serve badly, and recipients who want dollars. The weakest part of the evidence is the price, because no orchestrator or off-ramp publishes an all-in rate card for a corridor. The stablecoin costs below are my ranges, built from assumptions about each hop.
$50,000 to a supplier in Mexico
Back to the importer, at an illustrative 18.50 pesos per dollar for easy arithmetic (the rate on October 13, 2026 was about 18.23): MXN 925,000 at the mid-market rate. The supplier wants pesos by SPEI.
The stablecoin route, hop by hop:
Dollars to the orchestrator
- Who earns
- The importer's bank
- Low
- $1 (ACH)
- Typical
- $1 (ACH)
- High
- $45 (wire)
Dollars to coins, plus the orchestrator's markup
- Who earns
- The orchestrator; Circle mints free
- Low
- $0
- Typical
- About $50 (0.1%)
- High
- $250 (0.5%)
Transfer on the chain
- Who earns
- Validators
- Low
- A cent
- Typical
- About $1
- High
- $4 (USDT on Tron, to a new address)
Coins to pesos
- Who earns
- The off-ramp
- Low
- $50 (0.1%)
- Typical
- $150-250 (0.3-0.5%)
- High
- $750 (1.5%)
Pesos to the supplier by SPEI
- Who earns
- The off-ramp's bank
- Low
- $1
- Typical
- $1
- High
- $5
Total
- Who earns
- Low
- About $52 (0.1%)
- Typical
- About $200-300 (0.4-0.6%)
- High
- About $1,050 (2.1%)
Screening and Travel Rule data are inside the orchestrator's fee. The orchestrator's 0.1% comes from one outside review I couldn't verify, and the 0.5% is my assumption. The off-ramp spreads are my assumptions too, partly below the 0.5-1.5% one payout vendor quotes for Mexico; vendors claim 0.1-0.5% all in, which I couldn't trace to a rate card.
Against the other routes:
Bank wire, a bank converts
- Cost on $50,000
- About $800 at the Financial Stability Board's 2025 average (1.6%); roughly $400-1,700
- Supplier receives, at 18.50
- About MXN 910,000
- Time
- Minutes to 5 business days
Non-bank FX provider, local payout
- Cost on $50,000
- About $230-260 (0.45-0.52%), one large provider's public price on October 13, 2026
- Supplier receives, at 18.50
- About MXN 920,000
- Time
- Same day to a day
Stablecoin route
- Cost on $50,000
- About $200-300 (0.4-0.6%) typical; $50-1,050 range
- Supplier receives, at 18.50
- About MXN 920,000 typical
- Time
- Funding time plus minutes; 24/7 if funded by RTP
What I read from it:
- The chain: under a hundredth of a percent in every case. The orchestrator's markup and the off-ramp's spread are 90% or more of the stablecoin cost.
- Against the others: the typical case costs about a third of the average wire and about the same as the non-bank. The high case costs more than many wires.
- Speed: at 3.9%, $50,000 earns about $5 a day, so arriving two days sooner is worth about $11. The value is arriving on a Sunday, and knowing it will.
Other corridors change the answer. To the euro area, the same non-bank's price was 0.24-0.31%, which a stablecoin route will struggle to beat. To Brazil it was 0.82-0.89%, which leaves room, but Brazil's FX rules apply. To the Philippines, InstaPay for Business caps a transfer at ₱500,000, so $50,000 needs several transfers, and I found no verified business off-ramp rate there.
A $50,000 invoice inside the US
ACH credit
- Cost on $50,000
- Under a cent between banks ($0.0035 at the Fed); about $0.26-0.50 to the payer in an AFP survey
- Funds usable
- Same or next day
- If something goes wrong
- Nacha return rules
- Invoice data
- Full remittance in CTX
RTP or FedNow
- Cost on $50,000
- $0.045 between banks; banks' prices to customers aren't published
- Funds usable
- Seconds, 24/7, up to $10 million
- If something goes wrong
- Final; returns only by request
- Invoice data
- ISO 20022
Wire
- Cost on $50,000
- Under $1 at the Fed; roughly $15-35 to send plus an incoming fee, unverified
- Funds usable
- Minutes, bank hours
- If something goes wrong
- Final; recall by request
- Invoice data
- ISO 20022
Commercial card
- Cost on $50,000
- About $510-1,350 in interchange
- Funds usable
- 1-2 days
- If something goes wrong
- Chargebacks
- Invoice data
- Line items
Stablecoin through a processor
- Cost on $50,000
- $750 (1.5% at Stripe's list price)
- Funds usable
- On the processor's payout schedule
- If something goes wrong
- No disputes; refunds in coins
- Invoice data
- What the processor carries
Stablecoin, direct
- Cost on $50,000
- About $15-170 for two bank legs, minting and redeeming
- Funds usable
- Minutes, plus two bank legs
- If something goes wrong
- None; a refund is a new payment
- Invoice data
- Address and amount
At home, a stablecoin costs more than ACH and RTP, takes longer than RTP because it needs two bank legs, and drops the return rules and remittance data. Stripe also caps stablecoin payments at $10,000 per transaction, so this invoice would take at least five. A day of interest on $50,000 is worth about $5, the most speed can be worth here. The clear edge is a payer who already holds stablecoins and wants to pay on a weekend. More on receivables in order to cash.
Where stablecoins win, and where they don't
| Use | Best rail as of October 2026 | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic US invoice | ACH, RTP or FedNow | Cost, remittance data, return rules |
| Cross-border to the euro area or the UK | Bank or non-bank FX | Non-bank prices around 0.24-0.31% leave no room |
| Weekend payment to a corridor with a 24/7 local rail | Stablecoin route or a prefunded non-bank | Both run 24/7 once funded |
| Cash between a company's own entities | Stablecoin or a bank tokenized deposit | 24/7 and final; tokenized deposits where the company's bank offers them |
| Payouts to people without good banking | A coin the recipient holds | No local rail needed |
| Capital controls or unstable currencies (Argentina, Nigeria) | Stablecoin, where local law allows | Recipients want dollars |
Nobody measures B2B stablecoin payments well. The best-known estimate, from McKinsey and the analytics firm Artemis, puts them at about $226 billion a year at the end of 2025, roughly 0.01% of business payments worldwide. Its method isn't public, and single companies report volumes that don't fit it: one Mexican exchange claims a figure over a third of that size. I'd treat it as an order of magnitude. Raw on-chain volume is mostly trading; real payments were about 1% of it in 2025.
Banks are doing both: tokenized deposits and bank coins
Banks answered with their own ledgers first. JPMorgan's Kinexys averages more than $7 billion a day on a permissioned blockchain where clients hold tokenized deposits, and JPMorgan also issues a deposit token for institutional clients on Base, a public chain. Citi's Token Services went live for a bank client in Thailand on July 9, 2026, tied to its 24/7 dollar clearing. HSBC's tokenised deposit service reportedly reached the US in April 2026. Swift is piloting a shared ledger with 17 banks, and The Clearing House plans a tokenized-deposit network between banks for 2027. Kinexys moves in a day what all B2B stablecoin payments are estimated to move in about a week and a half, though much of it is interbank, FX and repo.
Then banks started issuing stablecoins too. On September 1, 2026, 21 banks including Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo committed to form a company to issue a stablecoin, with a dollar token planned for the first half of 2027. The Zelle owner banks launched ZelleUSD in June 2026, SoFi Bank launched SoFiUSD in May, and Anchorage Digital, a federally chartered bank, issues Tether's US coin. The market isn't splitting into deposits for banks and coins for everyone else: both kinds of issuer want the same flows.
| Stablecoin | Tokenized deposit | |
|---|---|---|
| Whose liability | A non-bank issuer or a bank subsidiary, against a reserve | The bank itself |
| Law | The GENIUS Act, MiCA and similar | Bank law; excluded from the GENIUS Act |
| Interest | None from the issuer | Possible, on the bank's terms |
| Insurance | Not insured to holders | Insured like any deposit, under the FDIC's proposal |
For a B2B product, the practical difference is the customer's bank. A large corporate whose bank runs a token network gets 24/7 settlement without leaving the banking system; a company whose bank doesn't is back to a stablecoin route or a non-bank.
What card networks mean by stablecoin settlement
When Visa or Mastercard says it settles in stablecoins, it means banks settle with the network in coins; merchants and cardholders see no change. Since December 16, 2025, US banks can settle with Visa in USDC on Solana seven days a week, and Visa's run rate passed $20 billion a year by September 8, 2026, a small fraction of a percent of its volume. Since June 3, 2026, Mastercard lets issuers and acquirers settle in six coins, including USDC, PYUSD, USDG and RLUSD, on eight networks, with its rules and disputes unchanged. The banks gain by parking less money over weekends.
Questions to ask a stablecoin provider
- What's the all-in price from dollars in to local currency out, hop by hop, including the spread against the mid-market rate at payout?
- Which coin, issuer and chain, and is it the issuer's own token on that chain? Can you redeem directly, and will the issuer be permitted from January 18, 2027?
- Who holds the coins, the dollars and the licence at each step, including the off-ramp in each country and its bank?
- What does your contract say about wrong addresses, freezes, a failed off-ramp and your own insolvency, and are customer coins held in the customer's name?
- How does the invoice reference travel, and does "settled" mean on-chain, in your books, or pesos in the supplier's account?
- What's the fallback when a chain halts or an off-ramp stops paying?