The Platform PM

Deep dive: stablecoins vs bank rails

Field Guide

B2B payments: stablecoins and blockchain payments

08

Deep dive: stablecoins vs bank rails

7 min read · Chapter 8 of 10

Stablecoins vs bank rails: what's real

My view as of October 2026: for a business payment, stablecoins beat a bank wire across borders, roughly tie a good non-bank FX provider, and lose to ACH and real-time payments at home. Where they clearly win is time and reach: weekends, corridors banks serve badly, and recipients who want dollars. The weakest part of the evidence is the price, because no orchestrator or off-ramp publishes an all-in rate card for a corridor. The stablecoin costs below are my ranges, built from assumptions about each hop.

$50,000 to a supplier in Mexico

Back to the importer, at an illustrative 18.50 pesos per dollar for easy arithmetic (the rate on October 13, 2026 was about 18.23): MXN 925,000 at the mid-market rate. The supplier wants pesos by SPEI.

The stablecoin route, hop by hop:

Dollars to the orchestrator

Who earns
The importer's bank
Low
$1 (ACH)
Typical
$1 (ACH)
High
$45 (wire)

Dollars to coins, plus the orchestrator's markup

Who earns
The orchestrator; Circle mints free
Low
$0
Typical
About $50 (0.1%)
High
$250 (0.5%)

Transfer on the chain

Who earns
Validators
Low
A cent
Typical
About $1
High
$4 (USDT on Tron, to a new address)

Coins to pesos

Who earns
The off-ramp
Low
$50 (0.1%)
Typical
$150-250 (0.3-0.5%)
High
$750 (1.5%)

Pesos to the supplier by SPEI

Who earns
The off-ramp's bank
Low
$1
Typical
$1
High
$5

Total

Who earns
Low
About $52 (0.1%)
Typical
About $200-300 (0.4-0.6%)
High
About $1,050 (2.1%)

Screening and Travel Rule data are inside the orchestrator's fee. The orchestrator's 0.1% comes from one outside review I couldn't verify, and the 0.5% is my assumption. The off-ramp spreads are my assumptions too, partly below the 0.5-1.5% one payout vendor quotes for Mexico; vendors claim 0.1-0.5% all in, which I couldn't trace to a rate card.

Against the other routes:

Bank wire, a bank converts

Cost on $50,000
About $800 at the Financial Stability Board's 2025 average (1.6%); roughly $400-1,700
Supplier receives, at 18.50
About MXN 910,000
Time
Minutes to 5 business days

Non-bank FX provider, local payout

Cost on $50,000
About $230-260 (0.45-0.52%), one large provider's public price on October 13, 2026
Supplier receives, at 18.50
About MXN 920,000
Time
Same day to a day

Stablecoin route

Cost on $50,000
About $200-300 (0.4-0.6%) typical; $50-1,050 range
Supplier receives, at 18.50
About MXN 920,000 typical
Time
Funding time plus minutes; 24/7 if funded by RTP

What I read from it:

  • The chain: under a hundredth of a percent in every case. The orchestrator's markup and the off-ramp's spread are 90% or more of the stablecoin cost.
  • Against the others: the typical case costs about a third of the average wire and about the same as the non-bank. The high case costs more than many wires.
  • Speed: at 3.9%, $50,000 earns about $5 a day, so arriving two days sooner is worth about $11. The value is arriving on a Sunday, and knowing it will.

Other corridors change the answer. To the euro area, the same non-bank's price was 0.24-0.31%, which a stablecoin route will struggle to beat. To Brazil it was 0.82-0.89%, which leaves room, but Brazil's FX rules apply. To the Philippines, InstaPay for Business caps a transfer at ₱500,000, so $50,000 needs several transfers, and I found no verified business off-ramp rate there.

A $50,000 invoice inside the US

ACH credit

Cost on $50,000
Under a cent between banks ($0.0035 at the Fed); about $0.26-0.50 to the payer in an AFP survey
Funds usable
Same or next day
If something goes wrong
Nacha return rules
Invoice data
Full remittance in CTX

RTP or FedNow

Cost on $50,000
$0.045 between banks; banks' prices to customers aren't published
Funds usable
Seconds, 24/7, up to $10 million
If something goes wrong
Final; returns only by request
Invoice data
ISO 20022

Wire

Cost on $50,000
Under $1 at the Fed; roughly $15-35 to send plus an incoming fee, unverified
Funds usable
Minutes, bank hours
If something goes wrong
Final; recall by request
Invoice data
ISO 20022

Commercial card

Cost on $50,000
About $510-1,350 in interchange
Funds usable
1-2 days
If something goes wrong
Chargebacks
Invoice data
Line items

Stablecoin through a processor

Cost on $50,000
$750 (1.5% at Stripe's list price)
Funds usable
On the processor's payout schedule
If something goes wrong
No disputes; refunds in coins
Invoice data
What the processor carries

Stablecoin, direct

Cost on $50,000
About $15-170 for two bank legs, minting and redeeming
Funds usable
Minutes, plus two bank legs
If something goes wrong
None; a refund is a new payment
Invoice data
Address and amount

At home, a stablecoin costs more than ACH and RTP, takes longer than RTP because it needs two bank legs, and drops the return rules and remittance data. Stripe also caps stablecoin payments at $10,000 per transaction, so this invoice would take at least five. A day of interest on $50,000 is worth about $5, the most speed can be worth here. The clear edge is a payer who already holds stablecoins and wants to pay on a weekend. More on receivables in order to cash.

Where stablecoins win, and where they don't

UseBest rail as of October 2026Why
Domestic US invoiceACH, RTP or FedNowCost, remittance data, return rules
Cross-border to the euro area or the UKBank or non-bank FXNon-bank prices around 0.24-0.31% leave no room
Weekend payment to a corridor with a 24/7 local railStablecoin route or a prefunded non-bankBoth run 24/7 once funded
Cash between a company's own entitiesStablecoin or a bank tokenized deposit24/7 and final; tokenized deposits where the company's bank offers them
Payouts to people without good bankingA coin the recipient holdsNo local rail needed
Capital controls or unstable currencies (Argentina, Nigeria)Stablecoin, where local law allowsRecipients want dollars

Nobody measures B2B stablecoin payments well. The best-known estimate, from McKinsey and the analytics firm Artemis, puts them at about $226 billion a year at the end of 2025, roughly 0.01% of business payments worldwide. Its method isn't public, and single companies report volumes that don't fit it: one Mexican exchange claims a figure over a third of that size. I'd treat it as an order of magnitude. Raw on-chain volume is mostly trading; real payments were about 1% of it in 2025.

Banks are doing both: tokenized deposits and bank coins

Banks answered with their own ledgers first. JPMorgan's Kinexys averages more than $7 billion a day on a permissioned blockchain where clients hold tokenized deposits, and JPMorgan also issues a deposit token for institutional clients on Base, a public chain. Citi's Token Services went live for a bank client in Thailand on July 9, 2026, tied to its 24/7 dollar clearing. HSBC's tokenised deposit service reportedly reached the US in April 2026. Swift is piloting a shared ledger with 17 banks, and The Clearing House plans a tokenized-deposit network between banks for 2027. Kinexys moves in a day what all B2B stablecoin payments are estimated to move in about a week and a half, though much of it is interbank, FX and repo.

Then banks started issuing stablecoins too. On September 1, 2026, 21 banks including Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo committed to form a company to issue a stablecoin, with a dollar token planned for the first half of 2027. The Zelle owner banks launched ZelleUSD in June 2026, SoFi Bank launched SoFiUSD in May, and Anchorage Digital, a federally chartered bank, issues Tether's US coin. The market isn't splitting into deposits for banks and coins for everyone else: both kinds of issuer want the same flows.

StablecoinTokenized deposit
Whose liabilityA non-bank issuer or a bank subsidiary, against a reserveThe bank itself
LawThe GENIUS Act, MiCA and similarBank law; excluded from the GENIUS Act
InterestNone from the issuerPossible, on the bank's terms
InsuranceNot insured to holdersInsured like any deposit, under the FDIC's proposal

For a B2B product, the practical difference is the customer's bank. A large corporate whose bank runs a token network gets 24/7 settlement without leaving the banking system; a company whose bank doesn't is back to a stablecoin route or a non-bank.

What card networks mean by stablecoin settlement

When Visa or Mastercard says it settles in stablecoins, it means banks settle with the network in coins; merchants and cardholders see no change. Since December 16, 2025, US banks can settle with Visa in USDC on Solana seven days a week, and Visa's run rate passed $20 billion a year by September 8, 2026, a small fraction of a percent of its volume. Since June 3, 2026, Mastercard lets issuers and acquirers settle in six coins, including USDC, PYUSD, USDG and RLUSD, on eight networks, with its rules and disputes unchanged. The banks gain by parking less money over weekends.

Questions to ask a stablecoin provider

  1. What's the all-in price from dollars in to local currency out, hop by hop, including the spread against the mid-market rate at payout?
  2. Which coin, issuer and chain, and is it the issuer's own token on that chain? Can you redeem directly, and will the issuer be permitted from January 18, 2027?
  3. Who holds the coins, the dollars and the licence at each step, including the off-ramp in each country and its bank?
  4. What does your contract say about wrong addresses, freezes, a failed off-ramp and your own insolvency, and are customer coins held in the customer's name?
  5. How does the invoice reference travel, and does "settled" mean on-chain, in your books, or pesos in the supplier's account?
  6. What's the fallback when a chain halts or an off-ramp stops paying?